Search engine optimization plans are not just “SEO help” bundled into a monthly fee. They are structured service agreements that define scope, deliverables, governance, timelines, and how success gets measured across technical SEO, content, and link acquisition. If you are comparing an SEO offer, the real question is not only “how much does it cost?” but “what gets done in month 1, what should happen by month 3, and how will we know it is working?”
Think of an SEO plan like a gym program: the audit is the assessment, technical fixes are your mobility work, content is strength training, and links are progressive overload. The best plan fits your current site health, growth target, budget, and internal resources—not just the lowest monthly price.
What “search engine optimization plans” actually are — pricing, scope, and common models
A search engine optimization plan is a packaged scope of work that usually combines an SEO audit, keyword research & keyword mapping, on-page optimization, technical SEO, content strategy & content creation, reporting, and sometimes link building as a deliverable. The price reflects not only labor, but also the agency’s process maturity, seniority, tooling, and the amount of implementation support included.
Common SEO pricing models include monthly retainers, fixed-scope projects, per-task/per-link pricing, performance-based pricing, and hybrids. As of 2026, most US buyers will see retainers used for ongoing growth, projects used for audits or site migrations, and hybrid plans used when link acquisition or content production needs a predictable monthly budget with defined output.
Google’s technical guidance on indexing and crawling remains the baseline for any credible SEO plan; see Google Search Central documentation for the technical standards that should inform setup and QA.
| Model | Best for | How pricing usually works |
|---|---|---|
| Retainer | Ongoing growth, content + technical + links | Monthly fee tied to a recurring scope and cadence |
| Project-based | Audits, migrations, one-time fixes | Flat fee for a defined start and finish |
| Performance / hybrid | Outcome-driven buyers, limited internal capacity | Base fee plus KPI-linked or output-linked components |
The right model depends on whether you need diagnosis, implementation, or sustained execution. A one-off project can fix a problem; a retainer keeps compounding gains; a performance model can align incentives, but it also requires tighter definitions of attribution, conversion quality, and acceptable lead types.
Typical deliverables by plan tier (basic → advanced)
Plan tiers differ less by “SEO theory” and more by execution depth. A basic package usually covers the essentials needed to stabilize visibility. A growth package adds content and more consistent optimization. An enterprise package adds cross-functional coordination, larger content volume, advanced technical work, and more robust governance.
| Deliverable area | Basic | Growth | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit | Light technical audit, top-priority fixes | Deeper crawl analysis, roadmap, QA | Full technical audit, templates, log review, stakeholders |
| Keyword research | Core keyword set | Keyword mapping by page type and intent | Multi-market mapping, cannibalization control, SERP segmentation |
| On-page work | Meta tags, headers, internal links | Content refreshes, schema, topical clusters | Programmatic on-page systems, testing, governance |
| Content | Editorial guidance only or 1–2 pieces | Monthly briefs and articles | Content strategy, briefs, production, refreshes, SME interviews |
| Links | Minimal or no link acquisition | Selective outreach and placements | Ongoing link building campaign with quality control |
| Reporting | Monthly summary | Monthly dashboard + action plan | Weekly cadence, SLA tracking, leadership reporting |
Basic plans are usually designed for sites with a small number of pages, limited competition, or a budget that can support only core maintenance. They often start with a technical audit, a few on-page optimizations, and monthly reporting. These plans can work if the site already has a decent foundation and just needs consistency.
Growth plans tend to include more keyword mapping, content optimization, editorial calendars, and a higher volume of deliverables. This tier is common for businesses that want to build topical authority, improve non-brand traffic, and compete in mid-difficulty SERPs.
Enterprise plans are built for larger sites, multiple service lines, ecommerce catalogs, or brands with significant technical complexity. They usually include more custom workflow design, deeper measurement, and cross-team coordination with developers, content teams, and stakeholders.
Deliverable details — what each line item usually includes (audit, keyword plan, content, links, reporting)
- SEO audit: A technical and content review that identifies crawl errors, indexation issues, duplicate content, broken internal links, redirect chains, canonicalisation problems, thin pages, and page-speed bottlenecks.
- Keyword mapping: A page-by-page assignment of target queries, search intent, and primary/secondary keywords so the same term is not assigned to multiple URLs.
- Content calendar: A monthly or quarterly publishing plan showing topic clusters, target pages, deadlines, SME review dates, and publication priority.
- Editorial briefs: Structured instructions for writers that define angle, search intent, headings, internal links, entity coverage, and conversion goals.
- On-page optimization: Title tags, meta descriptions, H1/H2 structure, internal links, image alt text, schema markup, and content expansion or consolidation.
- Link building: Outreach, digital PR, guest contributions, resource page placements, or editorial link acquisition aimed at earning relevant backlinks with safe anchor text variation.
- Reporting: Monthly reports, KPI dashboards, and a cadence for review meetings, including ranking movement, traffic changes, conversions, and next-step recommendations.
If your SEO offer does not specify which deliverables are included, ask whether the agency is providing strategy, implementation, or both. A plan that only produces recommendations can be useful, but it should be priced differently from one that also executes fixes and content updates.
For a line-by-line comparison of common link-building deliverables you might find in an SEO package, read Link Building Packages: What’s Included?
Pricing models explained (retainer, project-based, per-task, performance-based, hybrid)
-
Monthly retainer. This is the most common model for ongoing SEO. You pay a fixed monthly fee for an agreed scope that may include audit follow-up, content planning, on-page optimization, reporting, and link building coordination.
- Pros: predictable budgeting, continuous improvement, easier prioritization, stable cadence.
- Cons: scope creep risk, some retainers become “activity-based” instead of outcome-based, and low-cost retainers may not fund enough implementation.
-
Project-based. A flat-fee project is best for one-time work such as a technical audit, migration support, or a content gap analysis.
- Pros: clear start and end, easier procurement, good for discrete problems.
- Cons: less continuity, may require a second engagement to implement the roadmap, and results can stall if follow-through is weak.
-
Per-task or per-link. Pricing is tied to a specific output such as a page optimization, article brief, or backlink.
- Pros: transparent unit pricing, easy to budget line items.
- Cons: can incentivize volume over quality; if not governed well, the plan may maximize counted outputs instead of business outcomes.
-
Performance-based. Fees depend partly on rankings, traffic, leads, or revenue. This model is attractive to buyers, but it needs precise attribution rules.
- Pros: shared upside, strong incentive alignment.
- Cons: difficult attribution, longer lag times, and risk of gaming metrics if the agreement is not tightly written.
-
Hybrid. A base retainer plus variable output or performance components is often the most practical arrangement.
- Pros: balances predictability and accountability.
- Cons: requires careful contract design and regular governance.
If you want recurring execution, a retainer usually works best when the work is broad and iterative. For cadence ideas and scope structures, see Monthly Retainers for Links — How to Structure. If you are deciding between unit pricing and bundled scope, the article Per-Link Pricing vs Packages: Which Saves More? is the right companion resource.
One practical checklist for choosing a pricing model: do you need a diagnosis, a fixed output, or continuous improvement? If your site changes monthly, your content needs are ongoing, or your competitive set is active, a retainer or hybrid model is usually more realistic than a one-time project.
When each model makes sense — buyer scenarios (SME, ecommerce, lead-gen, local)
| Buyer scenario | Best-fit model | Why it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Small business / local service | Retainer or small project | Needs steady updates, location pages, reviews, and local visibility |
| Ecommerce | Hybrid or enterprise retainer | Requires technical fixes, category optimization, and scalable content |
| Lead generation | Retainer with content + links | Relies on landing pages, conversion tracking, and topical authority |
| Seasonal or one-time initiative | Project-based | Best for audits, migrations, or a short-term launch plan |
SMEs often overbuy complexity and underbuy execution. If that sounds familiar, compare packaged offers against marketplace-style purchasing in Packages vs Marketplaces for SMEs before committing to a long contract.
Pricing benchmarks & realistic cost ranges (USA) — small, mid-market, enterprise examples
US pricing varies widely by niche, site health, and competition. The ranges below are practical estimates built from agency invoice patterns, market survey signals, and public industry benchmarking from Ahrefs, Moz, and SEMrush as of 2025–2026. Treat them as planning bands, not guarantees.
| Company size | Typical monthly SEO range | Typical hourly rate | What that usually buys |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small business | $750–$3,000/month | $75–$150/hour | Audit follow-up, on-page work, limited content, light reporting |
| Mid-market | $3,000–$10,000/month | $125–$250/hour | Ongoing technical fixes, content strategy, link acquisition, dashboards |
| Enterprise | $10,000–$30,000+/month | $200–$400+/hour | Cross-team governance, large content programs, complex technical SEO |
| Sample package | Price range | Common inclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Starter local SEO | $800–$1,500/month | Local audits, citations, on-page updates, reporting |
| Growth content SEO | $2,500–$6,500/month | Keyword mapping, briefs, content updates, link outreach |
| Enterprise SEO program | $12,000–$25,000+/month | Technical roadmap, content operations, analytics, governance |
Small-business plans are usually priced to cover a narrow set of high-leverage tasks: fixing critical technical issues, improving page templates, and creating enough content to establish relevance. Mid-market plans typically add more content production, content refreshes, and higher-touch reporting. Enterprise budgets often reflect the complexity of internal approvals, multiple stakeholders, and the need for robust QA.
When you see a low price, check what is excluded. Sometimes the fee does not include content creation, development support, link outreach, reporting, or implementation time. A cheaper plan that only delivers a PDF audit can cost more overall if it never gets executed.
For a per-link budget lens that feeds into campaign planning, see How Much Does Link Building Cost Pricing and Per-Link Guide. If your budget is fixed and you are deciding how many placements to target, the guide How Many Links Fit a $1,000 Budget? can help you set realistic allocation bands.
How linkage/link building affects those ranges (per-link and campaign budget impact)
Link building can move an SEO plan from “maintenance” to “growth” because it adds direct cost, outreach labor, and quality control. A campaign budget increases when you target stronger domains, editorial placements, or more competitive niches. As of 2026, per-link pricing tends to rise with domain authority signals, editorial standards, and the amount of manual outreach required.
If a plan includes outreach-heavy placements, the budget should account for prospecting, vetting, content insertion, and replacement if a placement falls through. In lower-cost campaigns, you may see smaller site targets or fewer editorial standards. In higher-cost campaigns, you often pay for relevance, trust, and acceptance rates—not just a line item called “a backlink.”
Read Affordable Link Building Service Pricing and Reviews Guide to compare budget-friendly backlink options that integrate into monthly SEO retainers. When quality editorial links are required, consult the High PR Backlinks Service Pricing and Trustworthy Guide for price and trust indicators.
Agency vs freelancer vs in‑house — costs, pros, cons, and decision matrix
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Agency | Broader skill set, systems, continuity, reporting capacity | Markup, less flexibility, sometimes weaker senior attention |
| Freelancer / consultant | Lower overhead, direct access, specialized expertise | Limited capacity, dependence on one person, narrower execution bandwidth |
| In-house hire | Deep product knowledge, daily coordination, faster internal response | Salary plus benefits, tool costs, training, and slower ramp-up |
Agencies are usually a better fit if you need a team that can manage technical SEO, content planning, and link acquisition at the same time. Freelancers can be ideal for smaller scopes, audits, or specialist tasks. In-house makes sense when SEO is strategic enough to justify full-time capacity and long-term ownership.
Use Packages vs Marketplaces for SMEs to evaluate whether a bundled service or a self-serve marketplace better matches your buying style and internal workflow.
Decision flowchart: If you need strategy plus implementation and you lack internal bandwidth, choose an agency. If you need a one-time specialist fix, choose a freelancer or consultant. If SEO is core to revenue and requires daily coordination, hire in-house. If your budget is tight but you need some execution, a hybrid of internal ownership plus external specialist support is usually the most efficient path.
Setup & onboarding: a step-by-step 30–90 day plan for any SEO plan
The first 30–90 days determine whether an SEO plan becomes a structured growth program or a vague monthly spend. Setup should include discovery, access provisioning, baseline measurement, audit work, prioritization, sprint planning, and a clear definition of who owns each task. According to Google Search Central guidance, a site should be crawlable, indexable, and technically consistent before you chase content scale.
Below is a realistic onboarding sequence for a new SEO engagement.
- Discovery call and goal setting (days 1–3). The agency confirms business objectives, target markets, revenue drivers, top products or services, and current pain points. Responsibilities: client supplies context; SEO lead defines scope and measurement logic.
- Access checklist and permissions (days 1–7). Grant access to analytics, Search Console, CMS, tag manager, and any rank tracking tools. Responsibilities: client admin sets permissions; agency verifies access and records baseline settings.
- Baseline metrics export (days 3–7). Capture current organic traffic, indexed pages, impressions, CTR, conversions, and ranking visibility. Responsibilities: agency exports data; client validates conversion events.
- Technical crawl and audit (days 5–14). Run a crawl to identify 404s, 5xx errors, redirect chains, duplicate titles, thin content, canonical conflicts, pagination issues, sitemap mismatches, and structured data gaps.
- Opportunity mapping (days 10–20). Group issues into quick wins, medium lifts, and longer projects. Responsibilities: agency assigns impact/effort scores; client confirms which fixes need dev support.
- Keyword research and mapping (days 10–21). Build a keyword set by page type, search intent, and funnel stage. Remove cannibalization by assigning each primary term to one canonical URL.
- Content gap analysis (days 15–25). Identify missing pages, weak existing pages, and refresh opportunities. Deliver editorial briefs or a draft calendar.
- Technical fix sprint plan (days 15–30). Create a sprint backlog for site speed, crawlability, schema, internal linking, and metadata updates. Responsibilities: agency prioritizes; client/developer estimates implementation timing.
- Month 1 execution (days 20–30). Ship the highest-value changes first: titles/meta tags, internal links, broken page fixes, canonical updates, and template-level improvements.
- Month 2 content and authority work (days 31–60). Publish or refresh priority pages, build editorial briefs, and begin outreach or digital PR. Tie content to mapped keywords and conversion goals.
- Month 3 optimization and QA (days 61–90). Review initial results, test CTR improvements, expand successful content clusters, and close any implementation gaps. Adjust the roadmap based on actual rankings and traffic patterns.
- Governance and reporting cadence (ongoing). Lock the meeting rhythm, SLA, and acceptance criteria. Monthly reporting should show what changed, what moved, what is blocked, and what happens next.
Technical audit work should not be generic. A serious plan checks crawl errors, duplicate content, internal link depth, orphan pages, structured data, mobile usability, image bloat, and page speed. For reference on indexing and technical recommendations, keep Google Search Central documentation close during implementation.
Exact access and documents to prepare (technical access, content assets, brand guides)
- Google Search Console access
- GA4 access with the correct property and conversion events
- CMS/admin access or publishing workflow permissions
- Tag Manager access if events need QA
- Brand guidelines, tone of voice, and approved terminology
- Editorial guidelines and subject matter expert contacts
- Current sitemap, robots.txt notes, and redirect rules
- Priority service pages, categories, or location pages
- Historical SEO reports, if available
- Developer contact and deployment calendar
Sample filled access checklist: GSC verified, GA4 conversion events confirmed, CMS editor role granted, staging environment available, brand style guide uploaded, weekly standup scheduled, and one developer assigned to implement technical tickets.
Tool walkthroughs: In Google Search Console, open Performance, set date range to the last 3 months, export queries/pages, and note impressions, clicks, CTR, and average position. In Ahrefs or SEMrush, export the top organic keywords by URL and filter for terms where ranking position is 4–20; those are often the fastest priorities for content and on-page optimization.
Sample one-month sprint plan: Week 1: audit and access. Week 2: technical fixes and metadata updates. Week 3: content brief delivery and internal linking. Week 4: publish one refresh, QA schema, and review baseline deltas. That cadence gives both the SEO team and the client a clear first milestone.
KPIs, reporting cadence, and measuring ROI for SEO plans
The right KPIs depend on the plan’s stage. Early on, you care about crawlability, impressions, indexing, and top-funnel visibility. As the plan matures, you care more about clicks, rankings for priority terms, assisted conversions, lead quality, and revenue contribution. Core metrics usually include organic sessions, conversions, CTR (click-through rate), SERP feature visibility, average position, and page-level engagement.
A useful dashboard should include: indexed pages, organic traffic by landing page, conversions by landing page, non-brand traffic, keyword groups by intent, page speed indicators, and a backlog of open tickets. The point is not to drown in numbers; it is to know whether the plan is moving the right pages and whether the business is capturing value from that movement.
For measurement setup, consult Google Analytics / GA4 help and Google Search Console help to verify events, indexing status, and property ownership before you judge the results of an SEO plan.
| Cadence | What to review | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Work completed, blockers, rankings on priority pages | Confirms execution is on track |
| Monthly | Traffic, conversions, CTR, page-level movement, roadmap changes | Shows whether the plan is producing directional progress |
| Quarterly | Revenue impact, content cluster growth, technical debt reduction | Evaluates whether SEO is compounding |
Linking to ROI benchmarks & when to expect measurable outcomes
According to 2025 benchmark studies from industry publishers such as Ahrefs and SEMrush, ranking movement often appears before meaningful conversion lift, especially on pages with lower search volume or longer sales cycles. That means you may see impressions and keyword improvements in the first 60–90 days, but measurable ROI can lag by several months depending on conversion complexity.
Use the ROI Benchmarks by Niche & DR Tier guide to set realistic traffic and revenue targets for your SEO plan. Best case: technical fixes and quick-win pages improve within 1–3 months. Base case: meaningful traffic growth appears in 3–6 months. Worst case: if the site has major technical debt or weak demand, measurable returns can take 6–12 months.
Integrating link building with broader SEO plans — trade-offs & best practices
Link building is most effective when it supports a broader SEO plan rather than acting as a standalone purchase. The link strategy should align with the content roadmap, page priorities, and keyword mapping. That means backlinks should point to pages that can rank, convert, and support the site’s topical structure.
For an in-depth look at affordable backlink sources, tactics and pricing tiers that plug into any SEO plan, see the Affordable Link Building Service Pricing and Reviews Guide.
- Pros of integrated link building: stronger page authority, better indexation support for priority pages, faster ranking lift on competitive terms, and more efficient use of content assets.
- Cons of integrated link building: higher budget requirements, slower quality vetting, risk of misaligned anchor text, and the need for stronger governance.
- Best practice: diversify anchor text, keep links contextually relevant, favor editorial placements over low-trust pattern-based placements, and avoid aggressive velocity spikes on new domains.
- Risk control: do not over-optimize exact-match anchors; mix branded, partial-match, and topical anchors to preserve naturalness.
When quality editorial links are required, consult the High PR Backlinks Service Pricing and Trustworthy Guide for price and trust indicators. If your campaign needs a controlled monthly pace, the right approach is usually a modest base of editorial placements paired with content that can earn links organically over time.
Short case example: A B2B software brand started with stagnant non-brand traffic, weak internal linking, and no formal outreach process. Month 1 focused on audit fixes and canonical cleanup; month 2 added two cornerstone guides plus internal link restructuring; month 3 added outreach for editorial placements. The result was a steadier ranking climb without anchor text over-optimization and a healthier mix of branded and topical referrals.
For buyers who want recurring link spend, structure the campaign around page priorities, not just “number of links.” If the plan is measured by quality traffic and conversions, it is easier to justify editorial links than a large number of low-value placements.
Sample pricing templates, negotiation tips, and red flags to avoid
When you review an SEO proposal, insist on a written scope that shows exactly what is included, what is excluded, and how changes are handled. Pricing often looks straightforward until the contract adds setup fees, content limits, developer dependencies, or reporting add-ons.
| SOW item | Example structure | Buyer note |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly retainer | $3,500/month for audit follow-up, on-page work, content briefs, reporting | Confirm deliverable counts and revision limits |
| Setup fee | $1,000–$3,000 one-time onboarding and baseline audit | Clarify whether this overlaps with month 1 labor |
| Link budget | $1,500/month in outreach and placement costs | Separate labor from pass-through placement fees |
For deeper margin context, review Agency Markups on Links — What’s Fair? when negotiating price, and use Hidden Costs in Link Building Packages to check for add-ons and pass-through charges. If you want a quick planning tool, the Link Budget Calculator Template — Quick Win helps translate monthly spend into expected link volume and quality tiers.
- Negotiate deliverable definitions: ask what “content optimization” means, how many pages are covered, and how revisions are handled.
- Set acceptance criteria: define what counts as completed work, especially for technical tickets and content drafts.
- Clarify cancellation terms: know the notice period, auto-renewal rules, and whether unfinished work is delivered on exit.
- Separate labor from media costs: if links or placements have hard costs, request those line items explicitly.
- Cap scope changes: ask how out-of-scope requests will be priced and approved.
Red flags: vague deliverables, guaranteed ranking claims, no access to reports, hidden “management fees,” and contracts that do not specify ownership of content or assets created during the engagement.
Closing checklist & next steps — choose, negotiate, and start (actionable checklist)
- Confirm your primary goal: traffic, leads, revenue, or technical stabilization.
- Choose the pricing model that matches your operating rhythm.
- Request a written deliverables list and SLA.
- Ask for month 1–3 onboarding tasks and ownership by party.
- Verify access to GA4, GSC, and CMS before kickoff.
- Set baseline metrics and reporting cadence.
- Approve acceptance criteria for technical fixes and content deliverables.
- Review cancellation, renewal, and scope-change clauses.
- Confirm link-building rules, anchor text mix, and quality standards.
- Set a start date and first milestone review meeting.
If you compare plans this way, the cheapest SEO offer is not always the best value, and the most expensive one is not always the strongest. The right plan is the one that matches your current site condition, your growth target, and your internal capacity to implement. Start with scope, then pricing, then governance—and the ROI conversation becomes much easier to evaluate.
Frequently asked questions (short answers to link to longer FAQ section below)
- What are search engine optimization plans and how do they differ from one-off SEO projects?
- Retainer vs project-based SEO — which pricing model is better for small businesses?
- How do I estimate how much I should spend per month on an SEO plan?
- What should I expect to happen in the first 30, 60 and 90 days after starting an SEO plan?
- How long does it usually take for an SEO plan to show measurable ROI?
- Why are my rankings not improving after three months — what troubleshooting steps should I take?
- How do I ensure the backlinks included in my SEO plan are high quality and safe?
- What contract terms and red flags should I negotiate before signing an SEO service agreement?
Frequently Asked Questions
What are search engine optimization plans and how do they differ from one-off SEO projects?
Search engine optimization plans are ongoing service packages that combine audits, keyword mapping, on-page optimization, technical fixes, content, reporting, and sometimes links. One-off SEO projects have a defined start and finish, such as a technical audit or migration support, while plans are built for continuous improvement.
Retainer vs project-based SEO — which pricing model is better for small businesses?
Small businesses usually benefit from a retainer if they need steady content updates, local SEO, and ongoing optimization. A project-based model fits better when you need a one-time audit, site cleanup, or launch support. Choose the model that matches your internal capacity to implement changes.
How do I estimate how much I should spend per month on an SEO plan?
Estimate spend based on business size, competition, site health, and how much execution you need. As a US planning rule, many small businesses start around $750–$3,000 per month, mid-market sites often spend $3,000–$10,000, and enterprise programs usually require more.
What should I expect to happen in the first 30, 60 and 90 days after starting an SEO plan?
In the first 30 days, expect access setup, audits, baseline measurement, and quick technical fixes. By 60 days, you should see keyword mapping, content briefs, and more on-page work. By 90 days, the plan should show early ranking and traffic movement plus a clearer roadmap.
How long does it usually take for an SEO plan to show measurable ROI?
Measurable ROI often takes 3–6 months for simpler sites and longer for competitive or complex sites. Early signals like impressions and ranking gains can appear sooner, but traffic and conversion lift usually lag. Technical debt, content volume, and sales-cycle length affect timing.
Why are my rankings not improving after three months — what troubleshooting steps should I take?
Check whether technical fixes were actually implemented, whether pages are indexed, and whether keyword mapping is causing cannibalization. Review content quality, internal linking, site speed, and backlink quality. Also verify that the tracked pages match the business goals and that conversion events are set correctly.
How do I ensure the backlinks included in my SEO plan are high quality and safe?
Ask for placement criteria, relevance rules, anchor text mix, and the source domains before the work starts. Prefer editorial links from relevant sites, avoid exact-match anchor overuse, and confirm that the provider tracks domain quality, topical fit, and placement stability rather than just link quantity.
What contract terms and red flags should I negotiate before signing an SEO service agreement?
Negotiate deliverable definitions, acceptance criteria, cancellation terms, scope-change pricing, and who owns the content and assets. Red flags include guaranteed rankings, vague reporting, hidden fees, and contracts that do not separate labor from pass-through costs. Ask for a written SLA and month-by-month plan.